67 Comments
User's avatar
Letsrock's avatar

Now make the mfrs take Thimerosal out of eye drops and DENTAL AMALGAMS! I've had mercury poisoning thank you very much. πŸ‘ŽπŸ‘ŽπŸ‘Ž Bastards. Lost 20 yrs out of my life and had to walk away from my business bc I couldn't work. Motherfuckers.

Expand full comment
Truth Seeker's avatar

dental amalgams are about 55% mercury. The dental cartel decided to call them "silver"

fillings or the nebulous term amalgam. Deliberate deception for clueless people.

Expand full comment
Truth Seeker's avatar

Thimerosal is not in amalgams as such. In any case composites are 100X better.

Any health seeker with a mouth full of amalgams needs reconstruction and chelation...

Expand full comment
llaw555's avatar

I wouldn’t be surprised if many people have experienced it and think it’s something else.

Expand full comment
llaw555's avatar

It’s about time .

What adjuvant will they replace it with?

The WHO must be weeping.

Expand full comment
annapolis73's avatar

Thimerosal is a preservative. It added ZERO efficacy. Merely present to allow for multi dose vial manufacturing. Profits over people. They are indeed MFer's

Expand full comment
llaw555's avatar

It was used as an adjuvant because vaccines are so useless that they needed to poison the body to get an immune response. And the immune response has nothing to do with the actual disease they are claiming to eradicate. It’s criminal.

Expand full comment
Truth Seeker's avatar

Al is the adjuvant, Thimerosal is mercury (Hg) preservative

Both are heavy metals toxic to mammals...

As you mention its criminal and... deliberate.

Expand full comment
annapolis73's avatar

Thimerosal is not even an "adjuvant." It is bacteriostatic and fungistatic. Adjuvants like the "aluminum salts" are particularly dangerous when the metabolic rate of the recipient cannot clear it from the body.

Expand full comment
Truth Seeker's avatar

Sort of. It is not the "metabolic rate"

Heavy metals are elements toxic to human biology.

It is possible to chelate them out, a long discussion...

Expand full comment
annapolis73's avatar

Our Cleveland Clinic docs advised that "chelation" only would be indicated in "acute" Hg poisoning phase. As was the norm, we were unaware for years into the developmental delays, the facts surrounding heavy metal crossing the blood brain barrier. After thorough investigation of the medical literature, we have never seen chelation therapy intro'd that reversed damage in children, when administered years after the events.

Expand full comment
Truth Seeker's avatar

It may be time to reconsider from where expertise in this capacity is found. When the student is ready the teacher appears....

Expand full comment
Truth Seeker's avatar

Wrong clinic. If you suffered from Acute Hg poisoning a one way ticket to the ER would be your fate.

The literature is a pay to play scheme. The best educated fell for it.

Expand full comment
Truth Seeker's avatar

An adjuvant is added to any vax to deliberately provoke immune response when otherwise it would have no effect. Injecting any vax or quax (mRNA) into the bloodstream is stupid on steroids as is bypasses natural immune response...

The Medical Cartel forgot to tell peeps. They were foolish enough to comply.

None are safe, None are effective...

Auto Immune Disease is a total Medical Failure. They genius are happy to

parrot that the "don't know" the cause but do know they can script steroid and worse. Think the Vaxs and Quaxs, think the garbage in processed foods.

Expand full comment
Truth Seeker's avatar

Lets unpack this shall we? The mercury derivative is used to preserve.

The word efficacy is better applied to the desired effect of producing immune response. Al in this capacity is even more toxic than mercury.

These inclusions are deliberately toxic. It required clueless people to go along with

"professionals".

Expand full comment
annapolis73's avatar

The aluminum salts often the adjuvant used has been well documented for danger, but our friend Dr. Weiler. His work may be of interest to you:

Dr. James Lyons-Weiler from Popular Rationalism <popularrationalism@substack.com

Expand full comment
Letsrock's avatar

Fuck the WHO

Expand full comment
Truth Seeker's avatar

they have _ucked themselves

The US is out, the globalist agenda largely derailed.

Without US funding they circle the bowl.

Expand full comment
Truth Seeker's avatar

The WHO is a criminal ABC agency that has failed in its attempts for world control.

Thank DJT who has twice removed US membership as promised.

RFK has consistently revealed industry and now Pharma toxins.

The Snowflake Fake News WST, Atlantic, Politico, Guardian, NPR have zero credibilty.

Reading any of the above is taking their Programming. It is interesting to think one immune but false.

Expand full comment
llaw555's avatar

Add The NY Times to that.

Expand full comment
Truth Seeker's avatar

For sure, give credit where its due!

Expand full comment
JORGE ARROYO's avatar

It is well known, and scientifically proven, that viruses are not the cause of any disease (microbial or germ theory) but rather the consequence (cellular theory, Bechamp), which has been scientifically proven. However, and unfortunately, the germ theory (Pasteur) is the one that has prevailed

Expand full comment
Truth Seeker's avatar

Very interesting to note that many think it an important contribution to post links.

Evidence convinced no fool.

Fork in the road time. The wrong turn is the FALSE belief that health comes from needles.

How long with the dog chase its tail???

Expand full comment
llaw555's avatar

I DO post links annd believe it to be VERY IMPORTANT and not just a bloated opinion. Let people see it for themselves and draw their own conclusion.

And what I post is evidence based links. For example

The WHO at the 2019 Vaccine Conference says everything about the industry.

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/video/caught-on-camera-w-h-o-scientists-question-safety-of-vaccines/

And this is for those who call Fauci doctor of the decade. Fauci’s victims in his HIV days.

https://www.bitchute.com/video/UOPo2svGxGaA

Expand full comment
Truth Seeker's avatar

I understand your logic just do not agree with it.

Have been down the vax quax rabbit hole for many decades.

Which is why I maintain that evidence convinced no fool.

Not suggesting the evidence is faulty.

Now the better question is what exactly changes a false belief?

The answer remains elusive.

Expand full comment
llaw555's avatar

Experience.

But, sometimes reading something that isn’t opinion based makes an intelligent person question things.

Expand full comment
Truth Seeker's avatar

Been studying this exact question for decades

Knowledge, Wisdom that is cultivated by experience

The one asking the best questions gets the best answers.

If you can accomplish this with evidence go for it...

I wish that were possible, but think not.

Expand full comment
llaw555's avatar

Too long for my patience

Expand full comment
Truth Seeker's avatar

get it, also too long for others

Evidence convince no fool.

For that reason best to use the comment section for comments.

We are at the AI theshold. Many are using AI to pretend they have knowledge

about a topic when its just a copy and paste from AI...

Expand full comment
llaw555's avatar

And the joke is, AI is not always correct.

Expand full comment
Truth Seeker's avatar

This is highly significant for several reasons.

RFK published peer reviewed evidence proving neurotoxicity of mercury

used to preserve vaccines years ago. He was not early.

The Fake News Echo Chamber called it "Thimerosal" to cleverly disguise Mercury (Hg)

and confuse lay people. Then the libtard press went into action claiming that it had been removed from vaccines. That was also a lie, a boldface lie.

Next the narrative suggests that the amount used so small as to be irrelevant using ABC "data".

FRK did quantitative analysis proving that also a lie.

Now that confidence in the Medical Cartel and their bosses Big P is in the gutter, the time

is ripe for a seminal thrust of RFK's work to re emerge.

Thimerosal is still being used. Any amout is neurotoxic. It is important to realize

that the adjuvant Al in THIS content is much worse.

None are Safe, None are effective // All are toxic, some Genocidal

That is the short course folks. Some of us have known for 3 plus decades and were not early.

Expand full comment
LW's avatar

What horrible adjuvants ..ALUMINUM?.. will they put in its place? Who needs a flu vaccine? They’ve been proven not to work. Who needs any vaccines?

Who wants toxic horrible wearables?

What a joke .

Expand full comment
llaw555's avatar

I will not be doing any of this.

Expand full comment
Truth Seeker's avatar

There is and always has been an option. Will not disclose, as none are safe or effective.

Virus as agents of infectious disease do not exist.

As long as people continue to believe health comes from needles that problem persists...

Expand full comment
Michelle's avatar

Thimerosal is a preservative but youΒ΄re right in questioning with what other questionable substance it will be replaced by. Aluminum salts as adjuvants are additionally added (besides perservatives) to vaccines and they also cause problems......

Expand full comment
BlazeCloude3's avatar

How about the Graphene, Aluminum, Cobalt, DNA Plasmids and all the other junk self replicating and self constructing internal infrastructure towards redesigning humans into BORG which is an 'Extinction Level Event' of all life on Earth.

Anybody taking any type of injections carrying misnomer of 'Vaccine' is SUICIDAL/INSANE. Anybody giving this garbage to their children or pets is a murderer...EVIL.

Expand full comment
Ellen Henegar's avatar

How about removing mercury from dental amalgams??? I am beginning to suspect that my dental fillings may contain mercury and may be a cause of my lifelong migraines. I wish there were more data.

Expand full comment
llaw555's avatar

The transcript to this says everything you need to know. WHO’s 2019 conference on β€œThe Safety and Efficacy of Vaccines.”

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/video/caught-on-camera-w-h-o-scientists-question-safety-of-vaccines/

Expand full comment
Michelle's avatar

First you are instilled with the FEAR of bacteria and viruses and then a great vaccine gets rolled out - hooray.....

Expand full comment
Truth Seeker's avatar

What you must try to wrap your head around is the FACT that "virus" do not exist...

Bacteria and Fugus both do exist...

Expand full comment
John T's avatar

They definitely aren't anti-vax. They recommended the new RSV that the FDA just approved even with some safety concerns. Not enough died in the trials. One is too many.

Expand full comment
llaw555's avatar

The FDA seems to be approving a number of things that are UNHEALTHY.

Lab meat, genetically modified animals (pigs) to be brought in from the UK to sell here as food, and one of the agencies approved genetically modified Chestnut Trees.

This has got to stop.

Expand full comment
Truth Seeker's avatar

Critical to understand the term, and why it is wielded. As soon as you identify as "anti" you are boxed into a corner. Howz about reframing?? Pureblood fits nicely.

Expand full comment
John T's avatar

I understand the term. That is the media and big pharma recipient's term. The justification the new ACIP committee used for the new RSV shot is because it follows the same safety profile as Beyfortus. Many infants have already died from it. These aren't decisions being made any different than before. Recommending it to infants when the mother chose not to get the mRNA RSV shot for the antibodies is defacto recommending those mRNA shots. None of them are vaccines. Safety signals are already out there and those shots as well. They stated they would watch afterwards. This is business as usual. This is nothing different.

Expand full comment
Rosanne Aman's avatar

Seems we have gone from Evil to less evil!

Just get OUR resources out of this look here - no look here mess.

Bobby bought the deceptive Malone and his ilk con games.

Expand full comment
Truth Seeker's avatar

Maloney is definitely a mixed bag. He loves to file lawsuits and had a career

as a Virologist. That is an academic title used to indoctrinate young docs.

He has not earned my trust at all...

Expand full comment
llaw555's avatar

No, he hasn’t earned mine either. And Dr. Oz?! No.

Expand full comment
Truth Seeker's avatar

If a restaurant is as good as its last meal both are currently serving good grinds.

However each has left tracks in the sand...

Expand full comment
Michelle's avatar

Could you elaborate about Malone, please?

Expand full comment
Truth Seeker's avatar

not the place...

Expand full comment
annapolis73's avatar

I apologize for not writing "Louis" instead of "Wayne" in prior comment. Louis is an amazing advocate. I had just written to Wayne Rohde in another forum. He too is an outstanding person.

Expand full comment
Louis Conte's avatar

Hey! No worries. Wayne and I are pals. I'm happy to have name next to his.

Expand full comment
JORGE ARROYO's avatar

If I am not wrong, the ACIP has recomended the flu vaccine provided that has not mercury.

If massive vaccination has no sense at all, some vaccines even less. One of these is flu vaccine

There are several reasons for not being vaccinated with this vaccine: i) Of all the flu cases that occur in a year, one third are of unknown cause, another third is caused by several germs at once (in the flu, between 40/50 viruses are involved, including coronaviruses) and the remaining third is caused by a type of virus that is rarely talked about: rhinoviruses y ii) It is also forgotten that the flu vaccine is made from only one of the 40/50 viruses involved, the influenza virus. Finally, a 2018 Cochrane study concluded that the flu vaccine is effective in less than 1% of cases. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Feb 1; 2: CD001269. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001269.pub6

Expand full comment
Truth Seeker's avatar

As long as people believe the ABC agencies and the fantasies put forward by

Big P and the Medical Cartel the problems persists.

Virus as agents of infectious disease DO NOT EXIST. It really is that simple.

The Data is evidence, it convinced no fool.

Expand full comment
annapolis73's avatar

Please educate everyone. Wayne has been at the forefront for decades.

https://archive.org/stream/TheSimpsonwoodDocuments/The-Simpsonwood-Documents_djvu.txt

Expand full comment
annapolis73's avatar

It takes 20 years for the public to understand what I confronted when filing (2002) suit v. Phrma:

https://www.congress.gov/event/108th-congress/house-event/LC15045/text

Expand full comment
llaw555's avatar

What was your suit based on?

Expand full comment
annapolis73's avatar

Obviously, a mass tort claim. Our lawyers filled firs of it's kind in U.S District Court ( other similar suits dismissed in State Courts were removed to USCFC ( Vaccine Court), with theory that Thimerosal was not actually a component of"vaccine", but rather an adulterant, since it was an "additive" ( preservative). Hence, not protected by the liability shield of NCVIA 1986. Judge at first agreed & "stayed" our case. Then Congress added 'Lilly Rider" naming Thimerosal into the protected status. Lilly held the patents. Bill Frist, whose family owned HCA and were major Lilly shareholders was then Senate Majority leader, arranged the scheme. The fix was is. Our case was "dismissed" and we were then free to pursue our action in USCFC. We were then dismissed without any evidence heard, as 36 month statute of limitations was evoked. No "tolling" despite the facts.

This is how your government "protects" you! Russia, without the vodka.

Expand full comment
llaw555's avatar

Was this case a vaccine injury case?

Expand full comment
annapolis73's avatar

Yes. In each domain.

Expand full comment