Thanks for clearing up this controversy. From the beginning I have developed a faith, hope, and firm belief that RFK is behaving with integrity. I love that he keeps a pretty low profile, and is doing the work he is passionate about and Americans desperately need.
You see Heidi, it is impossible to bypass knowledge on the way to Wisdom.
RFK has just endorsed the MMR vax. Go figure. He has to some extent come out of the woodwork after DJT and his excellent team have exposed the Dems for Massive theft of taxpayer $$$. USAID is the biggest fraud ever exposed. It was used to funnel money into the coffers of Dem senators who make $180K per year and suddenly are worth 50-180 million. Further the same grift has been used to steal elections like 2020.
Meanwhile DOGE and Mr. Musk FURTHER expose the grifting while Pam Bondi "claws back" now 150 large.
Let’s be clear: There is no evidence of mass fraud at USAID.
What has happened is a flood of misinformation, mostly pushed by political figures and conspiracy accounts. Here’s what’s been falsely claimed — and what’s actually true:
CLAIM: USAID gave millions to Politico & AP. TRUTH: Total BS. They paid ~$44k for a subscription to Politico Pro. AP got nothing.
CLAIM: $32,000 for a transgender comic in Peru. TRUTH: Not USAID. It came from the State Department’s public diplomacy fund.
CLAIM: USAID funded a transgender opera in Colombia. TRUTH: Nope. That’s State Department again, not USAID.
CLAIM: $70k for a DEI musical in Ireland. TRUTH: Also State Department. USAID had zero to do with it.
CLAIM: $1.5 million for DEI programs in Serbia. TRUTH: Yes, this was USAID — and it was a normal workplace inclusion program, aligned with promoting democracy. Nothing shady.
CLAIM: USAID funded EV chargers in Vietnam. TRUTH: Made up. No evidence. No record. Just noise.
CLAIM: $6 million for tourism in Egypt. TRUTH: This is normal foreign aid — boosting local economies. Not fraud, not corruption.
CLAIM: “Billions stolen from USAID.” TRUTH: 100% false. No proof. Not even lawyers in court could back it up. Pure fantasy.
CLAIM: USAID paid media for positive coverage. TRUTH: Total fabrication. No such bribery or influence. Just a standard data subscription.
CLAIM: Anti-poppy programs helped the Taliban. TRUTH: Misleading. These were counter-narcotics efforts in a war zone. No direct Taliban funding.
CLAIM: Kevin Rudd got USAID money via Asia Society. TRUTH: Flat-out false. His office called it “a lie, pure and simple.”
CLAIM: USAID funded election interference in Brazil. TRUTH: Disinformation. The NGOs accused never even got USAID funding.
No, USAID is not a giant slush fund for DEI projects or shady media deals.
No, there is no proof of mass fraud.
Yes, most of these stories are deliberately twisted or completely fake.
As a truth seeker this should be obvious to you unless you are not interested in the truth ?
Whew! My sister asked me about Dr. Marks resigning because she had heard the distortions. I assured her that the Kennedy supporters were happy to see him go, but I hadn't realized the extent of what he had done. I'll continue to hold a vision of a brighter America where we have the support for good health! Go Bobby!
Its waaaay past time to take out the big pharma trash. No wonder big pharma is killing us when you got people like Fauci and Marks guarding us from big pharma when they are making millions from big pharma for their efforts. BTW, this is the only country in the world that would let doctors and researchers that work for the government keep royalty money for developing drugs and then leasing that patent to big pharma for millions. Time for Elon and Jr. to go scorched earth on these mouth breathers.
I read that article you cite from Biopharmadive, which admits that Marks was a PROPONENT of pharma not a regulator. I wondered if that website was critical of Big Pharma. But no, it seems to be enthusiastic about the money to be made in that industry -- when the regulators are proponents. The author also makes other admissions, "Marks was willing to [rush approvals] despite the risk of approving a therapy later found to be unsafe or ineffective." Is this unintentional or is the author not-so-subtly sabotaging the very practices he seems to endorse? Or, is he just so callous that he accepts collateral damage will be done when people have to make some money. I also noticed that the article talks about the "promise" of biotech, but doesn't have real successes to report.
The reason it is counter productive to read such propaganda is that it typically concludes with more questions than answers as you illustrate. Think "dog chasing its tail"
While a majority of people are viewing the world from inside of a MSM narrative construct, the humor won't be shared by so many that "hiding" is unnecessary.
"But what is shocking is that the media is so uncritical, and not honest"
THAT they can get away with without violating laws, so long as they are careful and pay attention to their hi-rises full of lawyers.
BigMedia will likely be the final villain that must be defeated, as they will continue support all under-villians during their indictments, trials, punishments...
If the VAERS database were so unprotected that anyone could access and make changes to it that, I think, would be ridiculous. Ever heard of read only? I am very encouraged that RFK and Children’s Health Defense are legally gaining access to information that is shedding light on past history and current events.
Secretary Kennedy was placed in his position to do exactly what he is doing. Marks needed to go since his agenda was the opposite of what Kennedy has been charged with. Mark’s allegiance was to big Pharma and Kennedy’s is to the mission of making America healthy again. Godspeed!
Still, Peter Marks is one man. He could not have caused all the corruption in FDA by himself. What higher-ups were protecting Marks in his corrupt position?
The fact that all the big pharma apparatchiks such as Marks have been doing everyhing they can to block access to the data is all one needs to know regarding the net risk vs benefit balance of vaccines.
The FDA wrote me back in late 2020 that IVM was unsafe for use because it had to be given at such large doses to help with Covid that it would harm people. I then asked if 12 mg QD X5 days was too high a dose (no one responded, of course).
The AP, some will recall, put out a hit piece minutes after Dr. Pierre Kory's very moving testimony at the Senate hearing for repurposed drugs (Dec. 2020?) - a clear attempt to discredit him, written by a Beatrice DuPuy - a former Teen Vogue writer....
I'm all for horse paste, and did very well with it. But you might consider that there is some value in contacting these dolts and getting a documented BS answer - it has some entertainment value.
Thanks for clearing up this controversy. From the beginning I have developed a faith, hope, and firm belief that RFK is behaving with integrity. I love that he keeps a pretty low profile, and is doing the work he is passionate about and Americans desperately need.
You see Heidi, it is impossible to bypass knowledge on the way to Wisdom.
RFK has just endorsed the MMR vax. Go figure. He has to some extent come out of the woodwork after DJT and his excellent team have exposed the Dems for Massive theft of taxpayer $$$. USAID is the biggest fraud ever exposed. It was used to funnel money into the coffers of Dem senators who make $180K per year and suddenly are worth 50-180 million. Further the same grift has been used to steal elections like 2020.
Meanwhile DOGE and Mr. Musk FURTHER expose the grifting while Pam Bondi "claws back" now 150 large.
Pay attention people...
Where is the fraud in USAID? You have been listening to too many disinformation spreaders... evidently NOT seeking the truth
if you actually do not know, you have publicly disclosed stupidity
Lol show me the actual truth truth seeker
I am not your library. Wake up and refrain from suggesting completely stupid assertions. You can type in USAID yourself.
Let’s be clear: There is no evidence of mass fraud at USAID.
What has happened is a flood of misinformation, mostly pushed by political figures and conspiracy accounts. Here’s what’s been falsely claimed — and what’s actually true:
CLAIM: USAID gave millions to Politico & AP. TRUTH: Total BS. They paid ~$44k for a subscription to Politico Pro. AP got nothing.
CLAIM: $32,000 for a transgender comic in Peru. TRUTH: Not USAID. It came from the State Department’s public diplomacy fund.
CLAIM: USAID funded a transgender opera in Colombia. TRUTH: Nope. That’s State Department again, not USAID.
CLAIM: $70k for a DEI musical in Ireland. TRUTH: Also State Department. USAID had zero to do with it.
CLAIM: $1.5 million for DEI programs in Serbia. TRUTH: Yes, this was USAID — and it was a normal workplace inclusion program, aligned with promoting democracy. Nothing shady.
CLAIM: USAID funded EV chargers in Vietnam. TRUTH: Made up. No evidence. No record. Just noise.
CLAIM: $6 million for tourism in Egypt. TRUTH: This is normal foreign aid — boosting local economies. Not fraud, not corruption.
CLAIM: “Billions stolen from USAID.” TRUTH: 100% false. No proof. Not even lawyers in court could back it up. Pure fantasy.
CLAIM: USAID paid media for positive coverage. TRUTH: Total fabrication. No such bribery or influence. Just a standard data subscription.
CLAIM: Anti-poppy programs helped the Taliban. TRUTH: Misleading. These were counter-narcotics efforts in a war zone. No direct Taliban funding.
CLAIM: Kevin Rudd got USAID money via Asia Society. TRUTH: Flat-out false. His office called it “a lie, pure and simple.”
CLAIM: USAID funded election interference in Brazil. TRUTH: Disinformation. The NGOs accused never even got USAID funding.
No, USAID is not a giant slush fund for DEI projects or shady media deals.
No, there is no proof of mass fraud.
Yes, most of these stories are deliberately twisted or completely fake.
As a truth seeker this should be obvious to you unless you are not interested in the truth ?
Good riddance to bad rubbish
Whew! My sister asked me about Dr. Marks resigning because she had heard the distortions. I assured her that the Kennedy supporters were happy to see him go, but I hadn't realized the extent of what he had done. I'll continue to hold a vision of a brighter America where we have the support for good health! Go Bobby!
"Bobby" just endorsed the MMR vax. So what is going on??????????
There's a lot of content on X you can use to educate yourself about this -
I care - Thank God this traitor is gone
Its waaaay past time to take out the big pharma trash. No wonder big pharma is killing us when you got people like Fauci and Marks guarding us from big pharma when they are making millions from big pharma for their efforts. BTW, this is the only country in the world that would let doctors and researchers that work for the government keep royalty money for developing drugs and then leasing that patent to big pharma for millions. Time for Elon and Jr. to go scorched earth on these mouth breathers.
They are Jon, and DJT is the visionary who facilitates and coordinates the entire plan.
Credit where it is due.
For those who DO NOT KNOW
RFK has given total credit to DJT, complete and total credit.
That is what a collaboration is...
I read that article you cite from Biopharmadive, which admits that Marks was a PROPONENT of pharma not a regulator. I wondered if that website was critical of Big Pharma. But no, it seems to be enthusiastic about the money to be made in that industry -- when the regulators are proponents. The author also makes other admissions, "Marks was willing to [rush approvals] despite the risk of approving a therapy later found to be unsafe or ineffective." Is this unintentional or is the author not-so-subtly sabotaging the very practices he seems to endorse? Or, is he just so callous that he accepts collateral damage will be done when people have to make some money. I also noticed that the article talks about the "promise" of biotech, but doesn't have real successes to report.
Thanks for the article. Keep us in the know.
VN, also follow the money. When the government employees make millions from big pharma protecting the citizens isn't their goal.
and the gubmint employees who exacty are they?
Salaried Dem senators. Many are worth 50-180 million from a salary
of 180K... Go figure
VN, follow the money......and they have made millions from big pharma for doing their bidding.
The reason it is counter productive to read such propaganda is that it typically concludes with more questions than answers as you illustrate. Think "dog chasing its tail"
All by design
It is becoming quite comical that these Big Pharma folks think they can hide.
@Kim F
While a majority of people are viewing the world from inside of a MSM narrative construct, the humor won't be shared by so many that "hiding" is unnecessary.
"But what is shocking is that the media is so uncritical, and not honest"
THAT they can get away with without violating laws, so long as they are careful and pay attention to their hi-rises full of lawyers.
BigMedia will likely be the final villain that must be defeated, as they will continue support all under-villians during their indictments, trials, punishments...
The fake news echo chamber has been the choir boys in the church for many many decades so it is not remotely shocking
It is an expose and it is comprehensive.
Big P, the Medical Cartel, and... the Fake News Echo Chamber
If the VAERS database were so unprotected that anyone could access and make changes to it that, I think, would be ridiculous. Ever heard of read only? I am very encouraged that RFK and Children’s Health Defense are legally gaining access to information that is shedding light on past history and current events.
Thank you for this Exposure Mr. Conte.
One more Pharma-Psychotic Exposed and gone.
Secretary Kennedy was placed in his position to do exactly what he is doing. Marks needed to go since his agenda was the opposite of what Kennedy has been charged with. Mark’s allegiance was to big Pharma and Kennedy’s is to the mission of making America healthy again. Godspeed!
I trust Kennedy over Mark's any day of the week.
Still, Peter Marks is one man. He could not have caused all the corruption in FDA by himself. What higher-ups were protecting Marks in his corrupt position?
The fraudulent ABC agency has been poisoning Americans for many decades.
They are now taking out the trash. There are details
Donald Grbac - good point
The fact that all the big pharma apparatchiks such as Marks have been doing everyhing they can to block access to the data is all one needs to know regarding the net risk vs benefit balance of vaccines.
Jail that MFer.
It shouldn’t be hard to prove that he knew his decisions were killing people. Sounds like federal murder charges would be appropriate.
The FDA wrote me back in late 2020 that IVM was unsafe for use because it had to be given at such large doses to help with Covid that it would harm people. I then asked if 12 mg QD X5 days was too high a dose (no one responded, of course).
The AP, some will recall, put out a hit piece minutes after Dr. Pierre Kory's very moving testimony at the Senate hearing for repurposed drugs (Dec. 2020?) - a clear attempt to discredit him, written by a Beatrice DuPuy - a former Teen Vogue writer....
Field soldiers are lackeys for the system. Why did you appeal to these dolts?
Horse paste for the win.
I'm all for horse paste, and did very well with it. But you might consider that there is some value in contacting these dolts and getting a documented BS answer - it has some entertainment value.
A sense of humor is always useful, however 20 mil dead and countless more disabled is not particularly funny...
ABC agencies are being defuned because they work to facilitate the corporate hog.