I don't know whether to laugh or cringe after reading this article. It (correctly) points out that donors to a political cause want to remain anonymous (which is their right), while the organization sponsoring the report receives some (or plenty) of its funding in the same manner! Then I see that one of these organizations is operated by…
I don't know whether to laugh or cringe after reading this article. It (correctly) points out that donors to a political cause want to remain anonymous (which is their right), while the organization sponsoring the report receives some (or plenty) of its funding in the same manner! Then I see that one of these organizations is operated by a former politician named Hillary Clinton! Does anyone doubt that said organization would have giving principles much different than Ms Clinton?
I don't know whether to laugh or cringe after reading this article. It (correctly) points out that donors to a political cause want to remain anonymous (which is their right), while the organization sponsoring the report receives some (or plenty) of its funding in the same manner! Then I see that one of these organizations is operated by a former politician named Hillary Clinton! Does anyone doubt that said organization would have giving principles much different than Ms Clinton?