Shouldn’t we all be calling Texas Department of Health? And perhaps we should be calling, en masse, a lot of places. We the People are not using our power. And the psychopaths keep moving their agenda forwards.
Deliberate. We are trained to emphasize that there were excellent docs in the pipeline but "someone" refused life saving treatments that are simple and effective and have exactly nothing to do with the virus bogeyman. Mycoplasma a likely candidate as it causes Pneumonia.
Diagnosing a Mennonite child with MRSA is medical incompetence as Dr. Kory points out.
For the record Dr. Kory is a virus chaser putting forth the idea that secondary bacterial infections are "common" after a "virus" episode. False beliefs are like that.
He also said that bacterial pneumonia can happen after any viral infection, not just measles.
That implies that the "case" was used to gin up MMR since many other virus of the day scams
have failed. The problem is that the well meaning but tethered docs fall in line!
Health care is thus no different than the man behind the curtain in Oz.
Dr. Mike Stone today further exposes the "virus" grift. Read his account as there is no such organism!
From the very beginning of my research into virology’s claims, my priority has been to examine the foundational evidence for the existence of “pathogenic viruses.” Rather than relying on external critiques, I chose to analyze virology’s own literature, exposing its pseudoscientific methods using the field’s own work. My approach has been to highlight the internal flaws and logical inconsistencies in virological research, demonstrating that its conclusions fail to meet essential scientific standards. The experiments had already been conducted, and the supposed “evidence” was already documented—I simply needed to expose how it failed to support virology’s claims. As Kary Mullis, the inventor of PCR, emphasized, challenging a scientific claim is ultimately about logic.
One does not need to be a virologist, work in a lab, or conduct experiments to critically evaluate the evidence behind a hypothesis. The key question is whether the foundational research adheres to the scientific method and provides logically sound evidence. If it does not, the hypothesis is invalid. The burden of proof lies entirely with those making the claim, meaning that anyone asserting virology’s conclusions as scientific fact must either produce valid evidence or acknowledge its absence.
This approach has been highly effective for myself and others working to expose the flaws of virology. Every aspect of this pseudoscientific field—from failed contagion studies to flawed cell culture experiments—has been systematically refuted using virology’s own sources. Through simple logic, we have demonstrated that the scientific evidence virology claims to have does not actually exist within its own literature and that the “viral” hypothesis has been repeatedly falsified. Their burden of proof remains unmet.
Yet some, while superficially acknowledging that virology lacks the necessary scientific evidence, take an unusual stance: they argue that the burden does not fall on virologists to prove their methods meet scientific standards. Instead, they insist that identifying the logical and methodological flaws in virology’s literature is not enough—that those challenging virology’s claims must also conduct laboratory experiments to disprove them. In other words, they believe we must perform our own cell culture and electron microscopy studies to expose the methodological fraud in virology’s conclusions.
"It was a day of frequent and heroic dosage and equally frequent and heroic bleeding. In the South, during the summer, there was a cry of fever, fever, fever, and calomel was used (a mercury chloride mineral with formula Hg2Cl2, mercury(I) chloride. By the 19th century, calomel was viewed as a miracle drug. It was used against almost every disease, including syphilis, bronchitis, cholera, ingrown toenails, teething, gout, tuberculosis, influenza, and cancer) along with quinine (medication used to treat malaria and babesiosis). These were administered lavishly, thus adding to the horror."
Denying water goes back to the allopaths use of calomel:
"Another area Dr. Tildren shared was one of the fallacies of the allopathic doctors: the fear of hydrating sick people. He noted that “water was forbidden to all fever patients because their systems were filled with mercury (calomel), and when Mercury is in, water must stay out; if not, salivation through mercurial poisoning takes place.” All of this is based on the principle that ”our most potent poisons are our best remedies.”
All that is needed to escalate to pneumonia is tylenol:
"symptoms and imaging findings rapidly improved after discontinuation of acetaminophen on day 4 of hospitalization...
Among the 17 patients, including our patient, 12 (70.6%) were female patients, five (29.4%) were male patients, and 16 (94.1%) were Japanese patients....
In all patients, the causative drug was discontinued at the start of treatment, and the condition of four (23.5%) patients improved with discontinuation of the drug alone, while 13 (76.5%) patients required corticosteroids. Two patients required ventilation management, and all patients were discharged with good outcomes."
Shouldn’t we all be calling Texas Department of Health? And perhaps we should be calling, en masse, a lot of places. We the People are not using our power. And the psychopaths keep moving their agenda forwards.
States already bow to hospitals. If a doctor reports a parent they are basically guilty until proven innocent.
Wait. They lied?? Who would ever lie about a disease and death? All these “measles” deaths should be really verified
Deliberate. We are trained to emphasize that there were excellent docs in the pipeline but "someone" refused life saving treatments that are simple and effective and have exactly nothing to do with the virus bogeyman. Mycoplasma a likely candidate as it causes Pneumonia.
Diagnosing a Mennonite child with MRSA is medical incompetence as Dr. Kory points out.
For the record Dr. Kory is a virus chaser putting forth the idea that secondary bacterial infections are "common" after a "virus" episode. False beliefs are like that.
He also said that bacterial pneumonia can happen after any viral infection, not just measles.
That implies that the "case" was used to gin up MMR since many other virus of the day scams
have failed. The problem is that the well meaning but tethered docs fall in line!
Health care is thus no different than the man behind the curtain in Oz.
When will HHS hold hospitals accountable?
Here's the link to the full interview with the parents on CHD.TV:
https://live.childrenshealthdefense.org/chd-tv/shows/good-morning-chd/breaking-news-doctors-review-texas-measles-medical-records/?source=substack_comment
If your child is unvaccinated, going to the hospital could be a death sentence. All it takes is one biased doctor to "teach you a lesson".
Dr. Mike Stone today further exposes the "virus" grift. Read his account as there is no such organism!
From the very beginning of my research into virology’s claims, my priority has been to examine the foundational evidence for the existence of “pathogenic viruses.” Rather than relying on external critiques, I chose to analyze virology’s own literature, exposing its pseudoscientific methods using the field’s own work. My approach has been to highlight the internal flaws and logical inconsistencies in virological research, demonstrating that its conclusions fail to meet essential scientific standards. The experiments had already been conducted, and the supposed “evidence” was already documented—I simply needed to expose how it failed to support virology’s claims. As Kary Mullis, the inventor of PCR, emphasized, challenging a scientific claim is ultimately about logic.
One does not need to be a virologist, work in a lab, or conduct experiments to critically evaluate the evidence behind a hypothesis. The key question is whether the foundational research adheres to the scientific method and provides logically sound evidence. If it does not, the hypothesis is invalid. The burden of proof lies entirely with those making the claim, meaning that anyone asserting virology’s conclusions as scientific fact must either produce valid evidence or acknowledge its absence.
This approach has been highly effective for myself and others working to expose the flaws of virology. Every aspect of this pseudoscientific field—from failed contagion studies to flawed cell culture experiments—has been systematically refuted using virology’s own sources. Through simple logic, we have demonstrated that the scientific evidence virology claims to have does not actually exist within its own literature and that the “viral” hypothesis has been repeatedly falsified. Their burden of proof remains unmet.
Yet some, while superficially acknowledging that virology lacks the necessary scientific evidence, take an unusual stance: they argue that the burden does not fall on virologists to prove their methods meet scientific standards. Instead, they insist that identifying the logical and methodological flaws in virology’s literature is not enough—that those challenging virology’s claims must also conduct laboratory experiments to disprove them. In other words, they believe we must perform our own cell culture and electron microscopy studies to expose the methodological fraud in virology’s conclusions.
MSM won't report on this.
The virus has been isolated:
"It was a day of frequent and heroic dosage and equally frequent and heroic bleeding. In the South, during the summer, there was a cry of fever, fever, fever, and calomel was used (a mercury chloride mineral with formula Hg2Cl2, mercury(I) chloride. By the 19th century, calomel was viewed as a miracle drug. It was used against almost every disease, including syphilis, bronchitis, cholera, ingrown toenails, teething, gout, tuberculosis, influenza, and cancer) along with quinine (medication used to treat malaria and babesiosis). These were administered lavishly, thus adding to the horror."
https://www.healthscience.org/dr-john-h-tilden-biography/
Denying water goes back to the allopaths use of calomel:
"Another area Dr. Tildren shared was one of the fallacies of the allopathic doctors: the fear of hydrating sick people. He noted that “water was forbidden to all fever patients because their systems were filled with mercury (calomel), and when Mercury is in, water must stay out; if not, salivation through mercurial poisoning takes place.” All of this is based on the principle that ”our most potent poisons are our best remedies.”
All that is needed to escalate to pneumonia is tylenol:
"symptoms and imaging findings rapidly improved after discontinuation of acetaminophen on day 4 of hospitalization...
Among the 17 patients, including our patient, 12 (70.6%) were female patients, five (29.4%) were male patients, and 16 (94.1%) were Japanese patients....
In all patients, the causative drug was discontinued at the start of treatment, and the condition of four (23.5%) patients improved with discontinuation of the drug alone, while 13 (76.5%) patients required corticosteroids. Two patients required ventilation management, and all patients were discharged with good outcomes."
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9516906/