20 Comments

It is so sweet to see this blog defend against the innane efforts to impeach Biden, while at the same time, this blog questions Biden's views and actions on specific subjects. The integrity of expressing support for Biden on the impeachment issue, despite being RFK's opponent in the primary is impressive.

I would be equally impressed if Biden acknowledged the many good works of RFK and then critiqued other RFK's positions...but sorry, Biden does not have this level of integrity. In fact, Biden's anti-democracy efforts are signs of a deep insecurity of the democratic process. Shame on Biden for such unethical actions.

Expand full comment

Kennedy has refused to personally criticize both Biden and Trump.

He's leading by example showing how we should all be behaving to each other despite our differences and disagreements, while the two incumbents of the respective parties exploit divisions and constantly engaging in hateful rhetoric and personal attacks.

Expand full comment

Bravo RFK, Jr. !!!

Expand full comment

please run as an independent. please

Expand full comment

I want to object to NPR's characterization that it's only Republicans that will face a backlash with a possible overreach in an impeachment inquiry. Without going too off-message for this forum, how about Democrats that obstruct when the evidence is clearly visible?

In the end, the nation is worse off if such activity is scuttled because of fear of overreach. The nation should be more concerned with the possibility that a sitting President is being investigated for possible criminal behavior. Especially when that behavior is clearly listed as an impeachable offense in the Constitution.

On another note: Since the DHS is continuing to deny Secret Service protection to RFK Jr, are they doing so based upon the adjective "major" in front of "candidate"? Are they presupposing the idea that anyone attempting to run for President under the Democrat banner that is NOT Biden is automatically not a major candidate for President? That idea is just plain disgusting, and shows that it was never Donald Trump and MAGA Republicans that were a threat to democracy; it was Biden himself! There is nothing more anti-democratic that trying to remove your political opponents from the ballot! Yet that is exactly what we see on two fronts with the Biden agenda.

Expand full comment

The interview with Stand for Health Freedom was fantastic! Deepest thanks as always.

I would like to share, below, a comment I made to Dr. McCullough’s Substack of yesterday (9/ 17) where a video clip featuring Trump’s defense of the shots challenges our collective sanity. I was stuck by this because this post answered a question I have struggled with since midterms.

Comment to Courageous Discourse:

Thank you Dr. McCullough! Your presentation to the EU was a truly historic and powerful “bottom line” to this SARS-2 episode.

If Trump cannot listen to your presentation and grasp where we are, he poses an unacceptable risk as a candidate. I was hoping he would repudiate the shots, but that is not happening. Whether he is delusional or playing a role, one can’t tell just yet (IMO). But an important question has been just now answered.

Since the run up to midterms I was writing to Senators Paul, Johnson and Rep Kean asking why no one will speak of the extermination of some 1M Americans by unethical hospital protocols. These dead Americans by their sacrifice were used as fear propaganda to sell the shots to the public (in addition to the vigorous media campaign attempting to discredit early treatments).

The mandates were imposed by corporations with not a word to employees about the sourcing of the shots from

DOD contractors. The vials (“viles”) are contaminated with monkey DNA, DNA plasmids and even metal particulates.

This last item was reported by inspectors in Japan in August, 2021 even before the mandate deadline in my own 20,000 employee high tech company that I was forced to leave in September ‘21. No one in their right mind would have accepted these shots if they had known about the contamination or the affirmative misrepresentation as Pharma product. Consumer laws in 50 States were violated as were cGMP statutes that pertain to good manufacturing practices. Sasha Latypova brought all of this to my own attention in Jan ‘23 (and likely well before I caught on) ... and at least to the attention of substack readers and anyone listening to her interviews with Kennedy, Jan Jekielek and others.

This means there was a universal failure of informed consent. Who was responsible for that failure? Who could have made all the difference by speaking up? We can cite Trump himself and the full list of Presidential Commendations for Warp Speed service. The medical advisors to corporations that imposed the mandates missed the boat on this ... they share some responsibility it seems but I am expecting too much of them. They had to have known the package inserts were blank and what that reasonably infers about product safety. But the deception and crimes were covered up (“papered over”) by vaccine information sheets (VIS) approved by the FDA. Trump cannot be forgiven his complicity.

So what the Republican Party was willing to mention before the midterms about the crimes of the Biden administration was constrained it would seem, to hide this complicity. It squandered the chance for voters to condemn the current administration for Crimes Against Humanity.

Expand full comment

"The New York Times believes that the impeachment inquiry is flawed"

Funny none of that skepticism has ever applied to Monsanto gmo... Saddam's WMDs.. Syria's Gas.. Steele Dossier... Ukraine Nazis... Covid masks, lockdowns or Safe & Effective mRNA transfections ... Jan 6... DNC primary...

Expand full comment

There are no republican or democratic solutions. There are only American solutions.

Expand full comment

“A little reminder that no President is elected by only getting votes from his own party. A victorious candidate reaches across party boundaries.” This.

Expand full comment

GO, BOBBY! Godspeed.

Expand full comment

Every time I read something from Kennedy I think Shades of Don Quixote. If he is real how can he be running as a Democrat? And now it's too late for him to run as an independent, so if he's there as a messenger of the Great f****** that is America fine, I suppose that is okay. But that's all he is.

Expand full comment

Every time I read something from Kennedy I think Shades of Don Quixote. If he is real how can he be running as a Democrat? And now it's too late for him to run as an independent, so if he's there as a messenger of the Great f****** that is America fine, I suppose that is okay. But that's all he is.

Expand full comment

How would an Independent President work in practice? Bobby would be one man sitting in a crowd all out to oppose him on everything?

Expand full comment
Sep 18, 2023·edited Sep 18, 2023

He's universally respected across the political divide, except for the DNC corporate minions. Kennedy can bring people together like no other President in the past 50 years.

Expand full comment

That's good to know. I thought he might have to use presidential veto power until they come onside.

Expand full comment

Here in the Netherlands we have a lot of experience with politicians starting a new party because they can't find a connection with the existing ones. You are certainly right that this can create serious complications. Getting a new party on the ground and campaigning at the same time is an almost inhumanly difficult task. But couldn't RFKjr. join an already existing party like the Libertarians?

Expand full comment

He’s not really that brand politically, but if that party —which is well established and gets their candidates on ballots (which is essential) — would be amenable to RFK, Jr. maybe there could be a “marriage of convenience” ???

Expand full comment

I guess the next question is how many democrat voters will vote outside of the democrat party if he isnt listed as democrat. Republicans dont seem to have a problem jumping ship for a Kennedy but he is going to need votes from the Democrat supporter base too to be more than just an also-run.

Expand full comment

This is my assessment: both traditional voters for Democrats and Republicans will vote for Kennedy in large numbers. Because they are first and foremost human beings and as human beings they recognize Kennedy's moral appeal in their souls.

Expand full comment