Discussion about this post

User's avatar
John Wright's avatar

Well, we could argue that the American people have shown a serious lack of critical thinking, so in that manner it would be "dangerous" to give the citizens power.

However, even worse, we've seen the danger of leaving the power with the corrupt tyranny of the democrats and republicans. So I would very much welcome the "danger" of the citizens. Seriously it's hard to imagine the situation getting worse. So let's elect Kennedy and give a shot to trying to improve the world!

Expand full comment
Daily Growler's avatar

I believe RFK to be the only American in public life who has the personal qualities, including courage and an open mind, that might save this country from falling into the abyss. Thus, I am puzzled by his public statements about Israel and the Palestinians, which seem to me to oversimplify the situation and reinforce the US Establishment's prescription for resolving all problems: violence. I read an October 13 Substack article by one of RFK's top policy advisors, Charles Eisenstein, entitled "Hamas, Israel, and the Devil on my Shoulder" that provides much more food for thought than what I have heard from RFK (a tweet and Fox appearance), but Mr. Eisenstein makes clear that his analysis is not shared by RFK and the campaign. When will RFK tell us his vision, if he has one, for bringing peace to the Middle East? Where does he disagree with Mr. Eisenstein? I do not ask this question out of idle curiosity. I have been working as a volunteer on RFK's campaign for several months, and I see this question beginning to gnaw away at the minds of more than a few of my fellow/sister volunteers.

Expand full comment
21 more comments...

No posts